Machiavellis insight about the inner workings of absolutist governments in the prince

In this chapter, Machiavelli asks the famous question, "Is it better to be loved or feared?

Machiavellis insight about the inner workings of absolutist governments in the prince

European term papers Disclaimer: Free essays on History: European posted on this site were donated by anonymous users and are provided for informational use only. European research paper Machiavelli's Absolute Nightmare essay presented on this page should not be viewed as a sample of our on-line writing service.

European, use the professional writing service offered by our company. When the word 'dictator' is used to describe the ruler of a country, the very word itself connotes viciousness, corruption and terror.

One might even use the term 'Machiavellian' to describe the actions and policies of this absolute leader. However, this term is seldom understood for what it truly means. Few people who use it actually understand the man and the views that gave birth to this word.

Few understand the underlying politics and principles upon which this description has built itself. Few understand Niccolo Machiavelli.

In his work, The Prince, Machiavelli offers a unique, yet far from perfect view of what it was to be an absolutist ruler in the early sixteenth century.

Far from perfect according to Ernst Cassirer, a prominent philosopher in the early twentieth century, because what few people come to know is that Machiavelli wrote this work intending it to stay within the circle of the Italian political system.

The fact alone that these men have all contributed in some way to the state of affairs in Italy in the 's, not to mention the concept that each of these men was forced to deal with political issues in the same geographical area, should serve as a reminder that the point Machiavelli is trying to make about absolutism has a Romanesque flavour to it.

In addition, Machiavelli's insight about the inner workings of absolutist governments may also be tainted with an abundance of spite. Being considered too dangerous to retain in government because of his vast intellect and experience, Machiavelli was dejected from the political stream in This may explain why it is that the politician turned into what is perceived as a radical analyst of the government.

However, despite the seemingly absurd stance Machiavelli takes, few are able to refute his arguments with any success. As will be discussed later in this paper, the idea that a prince should not reveal his true motives or influences sets up what is known in modern philosophy as a closed-belief trap.

This essentially means that the moment a ruler starts to refute Machiavelli's claims, he is only trying to hide his true nature as it has been exposed in The Prince. Voltaire, an acclaimed French philosopher of the eighteenth century, spoke on this matter when he wrote: This indicates that rather than just issuing political propaganda, Machiavelli incorporated a great deal of accuracy into the text.

Machiavellis insight about the inner workings of absolutist governments in the prince

It has even been noted by these aforementioned scholars that Machiavelli's observations are nothing new or revolutionary, yet are collections of arguments made by several scholars before him. These points seem to reenforce that Machiavelli incorporates truth in his writings.

While the scope of The Prince may be limited in its application to the Italian rulers of the late 's and early 's, and while it may be inspired by a personal vendetta, the historical accuracy of the work is indeed true.Carl von Clausewitz, the famous military theorist, said, “War is the continuation of politics by other means.” He meant military means.

Niccolò Machiavelli

Conversely, politics is the art of war cloaked in civility and procedure. Since all governments are either republics or principalities, Machiavelli noted, their people will be accustomed either to managing their own affairs or to accepting the leadership of a prince.

(For that reason, the safest princes are those who inherit their rule over people used to the family.). The Prince is a book about political power, and how to win elections, presented as revelations from the greatest political expert of all times Niccolò Machiavelli.

The Prince Author: Staffan A.

Chapter Learn the Rules of War | The Municipal Machiavelli

Persson. Niccolo Machiavelli's The Prince - Niccolo Machiavelli's The Prince Niccolo Machiavelli's The Prince examines the nature of power and his views of power are still somewhat in existence today.

I'll discuss this in this essay, emphasizing the following theses. Niccolò Machiavelli, whose father was a lawyer and brilliant tutor, was irreverent, witty, friendly, loyal to his friends, attracted to and by women and even wrote the best comedy of his day, the Mandrake. Andrews, L.

(), “ The relationship of political marketing to political lobbying: an examination of the Devonport campaign for the Trident refitting contract ”, in Harris, P. (Ed.), special edition on political marketing, European Journal of Marketing, Vol.

The Discourses by Niccolo Machiavelli is the famous political schemers treatise on Republican government compared to principality (or dictatorship). He is, of course, famous for his work "The Prince" which is classic bedtime reading for any want-to-be dictator or authoritarian ruler.4/5. For Machiavelli, all affairs of government are viewed through a military lens, because the ultimate goal of a government is self-preservation; military defense—embracing ideas of strategy, diplomacy, and geography—is the means by which governments preserve themselves. This is because a wise prince "is always compelled to injure those who have made him the new ruler" in order to secure his control. Although a prince "needs the goodwill of the inhabitants" to enter a state, it becomes impossible to maintain the people's "friendship" following a conquest.

30 No. 10/

The Prince Chapter 3 Summary & Analysis from LitCharts | The creators of SparkNotes